Uhhhh, I think Packrat just hit a homer....

Time to let it go.

Vote Libertarian!!

Depends on whos point of view.

Yeah...if the point of view is the inside of his own anus, then it's Madman's point of view.

He suffers from Cranial Rectosis.

Maybe, just maybe you're obsessed with Madman's rectum? Oh, and fat chicks too... and my mom.

Madman's Rectum=not so much.

Fat Chicks=nice boobies.

Your mom=the fattest and nicest boobs I've seen...I like gettin between em...

but she's too dirty. I might catch something, so I only hit that on Thursdays with three condoms. backatcha.

For all those wondering about Wilmac's taste in women, this is a picture of my mom...

Damn, it's not the best picture in the world...she's MUCH taller in person.

She's a MAN baby!

BTW, NY Madman, here is bit of interesting information, isnt it:

"..So what has this to do with politics? According to CAIR 78% of Muslims voted Republican in 2000. That is because many American Muslims say they share the same social values as the Republicans"

source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3422685.stm

There has been much written about Muslim political support for both parties. There is no doubt that Muslims gave plenty of money to Democrats. Hillary Clinton benefited from generous Muslim contributions as one example.

In the 2000 election most Muslims may have voted for Bush for two reasons:

-Al Gore is very pro-gay rights. Muslims are not.
-Joe Lieberman was running as VP. He is Jewish. Muslims hate Jews and perceived that ticket as being too pro-Israel to support.

To say that Muslims have primarily voted and supported Republicans would be false.

To rely on the BBC for any credible info regarding Arabs or Islam is a huge mistake. They are very biased. Why do you think people call them the "Baghdad Broadcasting Corp."?

To rely on CAIR as a credible source for any accurate information would also be a mistake. They are an organization with questionable motives and some of their leaders have been tied to terrorism.

CAIR Chairman Omar M. Ahmad told a crowd of California Muslims in July 1998, "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth."

Some interesting reading:

http://www.meforum.org/article/13

http://www.danielpipes.org/article/394

What are legitimate news sources to you Madman? Now you claim the BBC isn't worthy to get info. Where can we get info, so that we can have a discussion with you, without you resorting to that tired argument.

A list would be nice, please.

The BBC is not a good source to quote on Arab or Muslim affairs. They are totally biased in that area.

If they weren't, do you think the British Navy would have thrown them off their aircraft carrier in the beginning of the war?

Plus can you believe anyone who uses CAIR as a legitimate source for information as the linked article did?

Gotta agree. The BBC also won't allow their reporters to refer to Saddam as a former dictator because they supposedly want to not be biased. Is there anyone who doesn't think Saddam is a former dictator?

Um, xterrapin?

It's much worse than that.

The BBC Chairman had to quit today over an inquiry into what amounts to basically lies told by the BBC.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/cpress/20040128/ca_pr_on_wo/hutton_inquiry_7

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1033550.htm

The whole organization is nothing but a mere shadow of it's former self. They are not much different than most western elitist media machines. They are not above lying and twisting the facts to promote THEIR OWN political ideals.

You can read the BBC's own reporting on the Lord Hutton investigation below... that's if you can trust the BBC to report accurately on an investigation into itself.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2003/david_kelly_inquiry/

You mistook the meaning of my post, I wasn't accusing anybody who disagreed with me as being racist I was just waiting for you or your shadows to accuse Siddiqui of being a terrorist because he has an Arab background. Unfortuneately you were the only one that came close. But with your normal nazi-esque pro-genocide comments I wouldn't expect anything else from you.

One thing we both agree with, Siddiqui is pretty extreme, I don't agree with much he says except a few points in the article I linked. Yet you keep trying to put words in my mouth by claiming I like him or have some attraction to him. Just like the commie connections you keep trying to tie me to. I don't think anybody will disagree that you have a very active imagination.

And you claims that BBC is biased is one of the most hypocritical things you've ever said. Every link you post has right wing connections.
Your favorite source of information, NewsMax.com is more biased propaganda site than BBC, almost every story they have bashes liberals. All you have to do is check out their store to see where their bias lies.

I guess as with everything else in you mind, if it's not American its an enemy.

Just about every media outlet will show some form of bias, but there's a huge difference between showing bias and flat out lying. The BBC has done this and is rightfully paying the price for it.

eyup. :rolleyes:

truth be told - those guys did stand after every sentence that GW said. i would have just stood throughout the speech to save my knees.

up and down and up and down.