0 registered (),
66
Guests and
0
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#206057 - 06/06/05 07:14 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by Eric P.: Originally posted by Lazza: [b]Yet if Hilary doesn't run in 2008 who else could win it for the Dems? There are plenty of Democrat governors that can run. Haven't most of the recent presidents ran as governors?[/b]Yup. Most Presidents are former governors, NOT former Congress-men. There's a reason for that... Too many bills through Congress, with assinine clauses, that makes a person vote yes for one thing, then no, the next time around. Makes them look like they don't know how to take a stand/position on anything. The comprimising gets them in trouble, when it comes to being the leader of the country. So that's one more thing Hillary will have to worry about, if she were to run. She'll have to have some sort of experience being the leader of something (like maybe a VP, first), before she will be a candidate that could win the Presidency. I would expect her to run as a VP in 2008, not the Pres.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206058 - 06/06/05 07:32 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The current Republican party is imploding, what with the fundies pissed off at the moderates, the moderates pissed off at the fundies, and the corporate hacks pissed at both sides.
All the Dems have to do is sit back, drink some iced tea, and enjoy the show.
The only thing that would unite the Republicans at this point would be if Hillary got nominated. They ALL hate her.
Which is why I really hope they DON'T nominate her. It would be suicide.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206059 - 06/06/05 07:57 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by WilMac1023: The current Republican party is imploding, what with the fundies pissed off at the moderates, the moderates pissed off at the fundies, and the corporate hacks pissed at both sides. Really? Gee, I guess I should look around some more... I have yet to see a Republican say they weren't going to vote Republican anymore, based on this "implosion"... Hell, there's not a chance that the so-called "fundi's" or the so-called "moderates" are going to swing their votes over to the dumb, err, dark side... It's not Hillary that unites us... It's Democrats in general...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206060 - 06/06/05 08:03 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Member
Registered: 17/08/00
Posts: 1299
Loc: Yorktown, VA USA
|
you'll have to excuse WilMac...he's been sipping the "iced tea"
_________________________
jerseydevi1 "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. " -Thomas Jefferson
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206061 - 06/06/05 08:03 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Member
Registered: 12/09/00
Posts: 8375
Loc: the hue of dungeons and the sc...
|
Originally posted by porsche996: Originally posted by WilMac1023: [b]The current Republican party is imploding, what with the fundies pissed off at the moderates, the moderates pissed off at the fundies, and the corporate hacks pissed at both sides. Really? Gee, I guess I should look around some more... I have yet to see a Republican say they weren't going to vote Republican anymore, based on this "implosion"... Hell, there's not a chance that the so-called "fundi's" or the so-called "moderates" are going to swing their votes over to the dumb, err, dark side...
It's not Hillary that unites us... It's Democrats in general...[/b]There's already been some rumbling - fundies v. corporates. Each believes they deserve what they want - and they don't coincide.
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206062 - 06/06/05 09:11 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Frist is already in the doghouse with Republicans for letting some moderates go over his head and negotiate a deal with Democrats.
Not only that, the man is a DOCTOR that believes you can get AIDS from saliva. Yeah, that's the kind of genius Americans want running the country.
Santorum has said a TON of asanine things.
Not to mention all the hot water DeLay has found himself in.
You all have a MAJORITY in the House, Senate, you have the Presidency, and a majority on the Supreme Court, and you STILL haven't been able to get shit accomplished. And the reason is because of the corporate vs. fundie fight that is going on in the Republican ranks.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206063 - 06/06/05 09:48 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The Republicans are suffering from being too successful in the last election. They snuggled up to the far right despite their better judgement, and now the far right expect payback (on abortion and gay rights issues, for example) .. and rightly so. Easier said than done, with most moderate Republicans dragging their feet on such issues and wishing their far right constituents would simply go away. They won't. Now we have the usual political scandals, with the latest being with DeLay. The Dems won't let this go away. If DeLay is proven to be a sleazeball the Republicans will outcast him in a second, but the damage will already have been done. And let's not forget Iraq and related noise (abuse issues at Gitmo). Stuff like this stick. So no, I don't think the Republican party is imploding ... not by a long shot. But the euphoria of the 2004 elections is over. All is not well with them but with the likes of Karl Rove around I expect they'll do wonders in the next election. _Lazza PS - however if gas prices do not drop I'd say the Republicans are in really deep doo-doo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206065 - 06/06/05 10:12 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by Lazza: Yet if Hilary doesn't run in 2008 who else could win it for the Dems? Barak Obama... That is, if America can get past having a black president with a funny name. Lord knows, they probably can't.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206066 - 06/06/05 11:37 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by Shahram: Originally posted by Lazza: [b]Yet if Hilary doesn't run in 2008 who else could win it for the Dems? Barak Obama...
That is, if America can get past having a black president with a funny name. Lord knows, they probably can't.[/b]I could see him winning at some point, but I think '08 is a bit early - he's still pretty new to the national scene.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206067 - 06/06/05 11:52 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by porsche996: Hell, there's not a chance that the so-called "fundi's" or the so-called "moderates" are going to swing their votes over to the dumb, err, dark side... Are you serious? The true moderates of both parties can swing either way in an election. I'm sure a lot of moderate Republicans would certainly not vote for somebody like Santorum or DeLay. I used to be a registered Republican (now I'm an independent), and there is absolutely positively NO WAY IN HELL that I would ever even slightly consider voting for somebody like DeLay or Santorum. I don't give a shit who's on the other side - I don't think the best thing for America right now is a bigoted corrupt Nazi. That's not to say I'd like to cast my vote for somebody like Hillary or Kerry - but if it's one of them versus a right-wing neo-con, I will. Ideally I'll get to vote for a more moderate candidate (from either party). If the Republicans keep moving to the right they'll find themselves on the other side of the power balance very quickly.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206068 - 06/06/05 01:27 PM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206069 - 06/06/05 02:25 PM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by Desert_Rat: At least you were right in calling all your comments "Bullshit".
Yep, as conservatives, we're all a bunch of sick wannabe fascists. If we were, we'd just shoot liberal scum like you on sight. But instead we refrain and let you talk all the shit about this country and its leadership that you want because this is America, and you have that right.
Put down the houka. First, learn how to fucking spell. Second, show me any statement I've ever made that could remotely be considered "liberal" (at least in the textbook sense). I know you're not that smart, but it's just one word, and you should learn its meaning, especially if you're gonna go applying it to people. Third, since when is it a bad thing to "talk shit about this country and its leadership"? This country's leadership stinks to high hell, and its denizens are the dumb fucks who allow them to bend us over the counter. More people should be talking shit about this country and its leadership--we're getting fucked, not fondled, and it's about damn time you "conservatives" (conservative is in quotation marks because you're not conservative, you're Police State Liberals, as opposed to Welfare State Liberals) woke the fuck up and realized your blind adherence to this wannabe John Wayne propaganda is spurious, worth fuck-all, and call it what you want, it ain't "conservative" and it sure as hell ain't "defending freedom". It's corporate greed in a cowboy hat, and if you aren't smart or aware enough to see that, then you deserve the shitstorm you reap.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206070 - 06/06/05 03:58 PM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Near as I can tell, the only thing I mispelled is your Arabian dope smoking device.
If fuckwads like you would spend a little more time trying to make your country a better place rather than just pissing and moaning about how fucked up you think it is, maybe....JUST MAYBE things would improve.
Do you vote? Do you get involved in your community and get active in matters important to you?
Or do you just expect someone else to do it for you?
I vote in every election. I'm active with federal and local land use agencies around multi use issues. I spent 5 years in the military, including the first gulf war. I voluneteer for the USFS and worked for them all through high school and college. I provide a great website similar to XOC to thousands of people free of charge. I'm an NRA member - because I believe in my second amendment rights.
What do you give back to your country? Don't tell me about all the taxes you pay because I'm sure I've paid more than you have.
What makes me a "police state liberal"? Is it because I get annoyed hearing people like you bitch about the country I love? Is it because I look around the world and see that this is still the best country on the planet in which to live and prosper? Is it because I work hard to make a good living for me and my family and don't think that handouts to those who won't work for themselves should be given? Or is it because I support our military along with the decision to oust a tyrant guilty of 25 years of genocide against his own people? Well....Which is it?
You're right. Perhaps I am misusing the word, "liberal". It's very easy around here to apply that term to every cry baby who complains about the way things are without lifting a finger to do anything about it. On second thought, maybe I'm not so far off after all.
You're all talk.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206071 - 06/06/05 06:32 PM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by Desert_Rat: Near as I can tell, the only thing I mispelled is your Arabian dope smoking device.
You're right, you so rarely "mispell"...it's low of me to bring it up...I apologize.
If fuckwads like you would spend a little more time trying to make your country a better place rather than just pissing and moaning about how fucked up you think it is, maybe....JUST MAYBE things would improve.
You're right, maybe I should join the NRA or join a Pro-Life group, or give my money and time to the GOP...then the world would be a happy, prosperous place.
Do you vote?
Always. Mostly for candidates you've never heard of. I call them "wasted votes", partly because they're wasted, and partly because I must be wasted to keep voting for freak candidates that have no chance of winning anything.
Do you get involved in your community and get active in matters important to you?
Sure I do. I regularly enrich the lives of retards here on XOC. Hey, I'm doing it right now! What do I win?
Or do you just expect someone else to do it for you?
Wait, I can expect someone else to waste their vote for me? What a country!!!
I vote in every election.
Yeah...for the wrong candidates. Next.
I'm active with federal and local land use agencies around multi use issues.
Okay, that's commendable, but aside from benefitting people who like to 'wheel, how is this practice beneficial to the world?
I spent 5 years in the military, including the first gulf war.
Wow...so now the citizens of the great nation of Kuwait can enjoy their Filipino indentured servants in peace. Sorry...not impressed.
I voluneteer for the USFS and worked for them all through high school and college. I provide a great website similar to XOC to thousands of people free of charge.
Does your website feed, clothe, educate? Does it provide some sort of platform for the voices of suppressed Chinese dissidents or something? No? Then, other than entertainment, which I agree is of the utmost importance, what sort of service do you provide?
I'm an NRA member - because I believe in my second amendment rights.
I believe in my rights too. I want to keep my guns, but the NRA continually backs Republican candidates that work night and fucking day to undermine other rights while posing to back the 2nd Amendment. Sorry, 2nd Amendment doesn't mean shit if you don't have a 4th or a 1st.
What do you give back to your country? Don't tell me about all the taxes you pay because I'm sure I've paid more than you have.
By virtue of the fact that you're older than me and make more money would allude to the fact that you have, in fact, paid more taxes than I have. Whoopee. And what, like my stoner wisdom and scathing humor aren't enough of a contribution?
What makes me a "police state liberal"? Is it because I get annoyed hearing people like you bitch about the country I love?
What's the matter? Don't think the country can stand up to the criticism?
Is it because I look around the world and see that this is still the best country on the planet in which to live and prosper? Is it because I work hard to make a good living for me and my family and don't think that handouts to those who won't work for themselves should be given? Or is it because I support our military along with the decision to oust a tyrant guilty of 25 years of genocide against his own people? Well....Which is it?
Well, for starters it could be your constant adherence and vehement defense of a Party which constantly works with its "opposition" to provide its corporate backers with political and legal carte blanche. It could also be your willingness to agree whole-heartedly with a political machine that, together with its allies across the aisle, undermines political competition and opposition in order to extinguish any possible chance of an interloper candidate or party, not to mention its constant attack on the delicate system of checks and balances that keep this country in some semblance of political equilibrium. Mostly it's your admitted allegiance to a Party that continually fails to recognize the rights of the individual to privacy and self-determination, and the support of its mad power grab that will result in the loss of more freedom and further militarization of American culture and life. Police State Liberal, like it or not, that's what you are.
You're right. Perhaps I am misusing the word, "liberal". It's very easy around here to apply that term to every cry baby who complains about the way things are without lifting a finger to do anything about it. On second thought, maybe I'm not so far off after all.
No, you're right on. You are misusing the word "liberal", especially when it is applied to you. I see you here crying and moaning just as much as WilMac or Dobermann or anyone else.
You're all talk.
Whatever you say, action man.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206072 - 07/06/05 08:33 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I made my points. Your comebacks are thin at best.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206073 - 07/06/05 08:49 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by pnwbeers: Originally posted by porsche996: [b]Hell, there's not a chance that the so-called "fundi's" or the so-called "moderates" are going to swing their votes over to the dumb, err, dark side... Are you serious? The true moderates of both parties can swing either way in an election. I'm sure a lot of moderate Republicans would certainly not vote for somebody like Santorum or DeLay.
I used to be a registered Republican..... .....Republicans keep moving to the right they'll find themselves on the other side of the power balance very quickly.[/b]Agreed. I'm a Republican by registration, but consider myself a swing voter. I vote for the person, not the party. Kerry's redux of his Vietnam press conferences (this time against Gulf II), didn't qualify as an effective campaigning method, so there was no way for him to earn my vote. My hope is that both parties will come up with candidates who want what's best for America and have the facilities to employ solutions. I want to be torn between two strong candidates instead of feeling like I'm voting for the "lesser evil".
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206074 - 08/06/05 06:51 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Member
Registered: 17/04/03
Posts: 347
Loc: Illinois
|
I don't think Shahram told us one good thing he does for the country in his comeback, unless you count bitching and moaning. A good attempt at some witty comebacks but not much substance. All I got out of it was that he votes for worthless candidates and likes to bitch. Keep up the good work.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206075 - 08/06/05 08:54 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by great pyr-hauler: I don't think Shahram told us one good thing he does for the country in his comeback, unless you count bitching and moaning. A good attempt at some witty comebacks but not much substance. All I got out of it was that he votes for worthless candidates and likes to bitch. Keep up the good work. Don't worry. This is typical for his posts. In his never-ending attempt at wittiness, he never, ever, posts anything of substance. Or any actual useful information in a comeback. In all honesty, he really sucks at the whole internete arguement... You can't always win by being funny...most times you just end up looking stupid.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206076 - 08/06/05 11:15 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by porsche996: Originally posted by great pyr-hauler: Shahram's so crazy, I wanna have his baby. True dat. Shahram is da hotness.Listen, kids, I'm only gonna say this once. It's the internet. More importantly, it's XOC.I never post anything of substance. It's true. But for your own sake, please don't come to XOC for substance. You want substance? Read a fucking book. Pick up the latest issue of the Economist. Take a college course, or visit a museum. You ain't gonna get it from XOC. Plus, it's not exactly wise to get into some sort of substantial argument with some mouth-breather who doesn't understand the basic fundamentals of politics, culture, history, or anything else about how the world is formed around him. How can you have a proper discussion with someone whose only response is "Well, if you don't like it, why don't you move to Iran where you came from." We're not exactly talking about an exchange between geniuses here. I've tried arguing with fact, but it's slow, and these threads happen quick. Plus, facts are usually ignored: Shahram: According to the Tax Foundation, California subsidizes the nation at unrivaled levels....here are some numbers... Desert_Rat: I don't care about numbers. Californians is faggots. Faggots should go back to Mexico. off2cjb: Jesus hates faggots. And Mexicans. When MY Lord comes, they will all pay for their transgressions against America. porsche996: And if you don't like it, you should pack up your Volvo and leave the country. 2001Frontier: And while you're at it, take your Mexican boyfriend with you! See? That was taken from an actual thread! The only thing I left out was the 82 misspellings and 347 grammar mistakes. My point is, any amount of substance would probaby be wasted on you lot, so why bother? The best I can hope for is that I get a laugh out of somebody. One thing you can't argue is that my posts are consistently funny. And if they're not funny, they're at least entertaining. Maybe I do suck at the whole "internete debate" thingy...so you're like, what, XOC's James Carville now? You've got the market cornered on wit and wisdom? C'mon, dude, I've seen enough of your posts to conclude that you aren't exactly the Modern Enlightened Man you'd like to think you are. You CAN always win by being funny. Being funny brings you out of the game, it transcends the argument. It breaks the tension. It flusters, frustrates, and generally fucks with people who get so caught up in their own bullshit, that they can't see straight. It's fun. And as for me looking stupid, well, I'm definitely not afraid to look stupid. Hell, I'd rather look stupid than be stupid.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206077 - 08/06/05 11:57 AM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I guess this is why it's called the "Xterra Owner's Club". Lurker! Seems to me that some folks have been banned for inciting arguments without having anything productive to say. I guess we've been through all of this before haven't we? Enjoy your thoughts as you're the only one who cares about them. Have a pleasant stay will ya?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206078 - 08/06/05 12:06 PM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Woohoo! Since we're playing the, "stupid quotes from stupid folks" game, here's a few classics: (Note, they are ALL from Sharam...) "Nope, the next truck I buy will have been built by some ancestor-worshipping kamikaze midget, not some PBR-drunk Bubba with a third-grade education and a $40 a day meth habit to support." "I dated a junkie, okay" "Don't forget that Dec. 7th marks the beginning of "Chakakhan", the Jewish celebration of Christmas. The Jew lights seven candles, one for each Jew banker that lives underneath the earth in a secret bunker and controls the world's money supply." And finally: "Hey, didn't I win this thread last week?" You did get one thing right, though. You definately only post things that you think are funny. Come to think of it, when taken out of context, you are pretty funny. Or sad. I can't figure out which. Saddest thing is, as much as you profess to hate XOC, the members here, the conversations, etc., you still keep coming here. I realize this must be your relief...posting illegible psuedo-intelligent dribble trying to man-up to whomever you're responding, by attempting to sound intellectually humorous. See, I can throw together a bunch of words in some random order, and sound stupid doing it, too. The thing is, this is how all your posts come off. I only hope, for your sake, you are only sounding stupid, instead of being stupid. So go ahead. Pick through this post, and do the only thing you're good at...spell check. Congratulations. I've found that the only purpose you serve is to spell check others. Congratulations! You've now relegated yourself as a cheap Microsoft tool. Keep the spell check coming. XOC definately needs a spell checking secretary. God knows we all forgot how to spell, once computers came around. Turns out it's not worth the effort when any monkey w/ a keyboard can do it for you.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206079 - 08/06/05 12:19 PM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Damn You fixed your typo before I could quote it... Nice job, now what the hell can he do?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206080 - 08/06/05 12:21 PM
Re: President Clinton
|
Member
Registered: 24/08/01
Posts: 6327
Loc: The land of losers and liberal...
|
I can't possibly be the only person that thinks Shahram brings the funny can I? As far as his not having an Xterra, there are a lot of people who post here that don't drive an X (anymore or never had one) that are less entertaining than Angry Sharamy. No one is going to change the world with any political discussions on XOC anyways. Nor is anyone going to change their mind with anything anyone says here. And Desert_Rat, excepting your military service, your social contributions seem only related to issues that directly affect you and there is probably someone working harder than you are to counter your efforts. It's the American way. So really, by doing nothing but standing on the sidelines and bitching, Shahram is probably breaking even.
_________________________
If we do not succeed, then we run the risk of failure. - Vice President James Danforth "Dan" Quayle
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#206081 - 08/06/05 12:28 PM
Re: President Clinton
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I'd buy Desert_Rat a beer before I would Shahram, unless I'm coming out of the Men's room with it. It's all in fun! Good ol' internet, gatta love it!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|